Materials Comparison: Steady State Cold Face Analysis of Eight 1/2"
Materials at 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200, 1400, 1600, 1800 °F
|
||
|
|
|
| 03003 | ||
|
||
|
Materials Comparison: Steady State Cold Face Analysis of Eight 1/2"
|
||
|
Materials at 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200, 1400, 1600, 1800 °F
|
||
|
||
| Based on the analysis illustrated below, ThermoDyne’s microporous materials provide the lowest cold face temperature of any of the other common materials listed. It should be noted that the non-microporous materials are often used in applications where microporous materials are better suited, and microporous materials can easily be justified in most instances. | ||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| *Figures represented above should be used for modeling and comparison purposes only and not for exact thermal calculations or engineering design specifications or parameters. | ||
|
||
|
||